Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. VanCleave

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 22, 1900No. 3,169PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Newton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHenley, J.

—This was an action for damages growing out of the alleged malicious prosecution of appellee by appellant. Appellee recovered judgment in the lower court for $1,500. The only error assigned in this court arises *509upon the action of the lower court in overruling appellant’s motion for a new trial. Counsel for appellee have not favored us with a brief. It is urged by counsel for appellant that the verdict of the jury is not sustained by sufficient evidence. The evidence is conflicting upon all the essential questions in issue. Much evidence was introduced by both parties to this action, and upon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Taber v. HutsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  2. Pennsylvania Co. v. WeddleIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Coleman v. AllenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Lytton v. BairdIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Meyer v. BohlfingIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Riverside Insurance v. PedigoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. DixonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1911
  3. Dwyer v. McCleanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
  4. Estes v. Hancock County BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Pontius v. KimbleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API