Legal Opinion

Vitromar Piece Dye Works v. Lawrence of London, Ltd.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 31, 1969No. Gen. 53,204Published

1Opinion of the Court

119 Ill. App.2d 301 (1969)

256 N.E.2d 135

Vitromar Piece Dye Works, a Corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

Lawrence of London, Ltd., a Corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

Gen. No. 53,204.

Illinois Appellate Court — First District.

December 31, 1969.

Rehearing denied February 19, 1970.

Weiss, Weiner, Levine and Swiedler, Simon & Ingram, of Chicago (Ernest Swiedler, Robert B. Simon and John D. Ingram, of counsel), for appellant.

McDermott, Will & Emery, of Chicago (Hamilton Smith and James E. Betke, of counsel), for appellee.

TRAPP, P.J.

Upon trial before the court on a complaint and counterclaim concerning a…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Halsted v. Globe Indemnity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1932
  3. Lovett v. Emory University, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
  4. Racklin-Fagin Construction Corp. v. VillarAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1935
  5. Nash v. WeidenfeldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API