Legal Opinion

Racklin-Fagin Construction Corp. v. Villar

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 27, 1935PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

A contract to paint two pictures of a particular size for hanging in the lobby of plaintiff’s apartment house is a contract for work, labor and services and is not within the purview of the Sales Act (Pers. Prop. Law, §§ 82-159). Since the paintings have been completed and are held by the tenant at the disposal of the plaintiff landlord, the former is entitled in accordance with the contract to be paid the full price by crediting him with the payment of ten months’ rent as it comes due from October 1, 1934, through July 31, 1935. The rent for the last ten months was not due at the time of the…

2Cited by10 opinions

  1. Perlmutter v. Beth David HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Aced v. Hobbs-Sesack Plumbing Co.California Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Wm. H. Wise & Co. v. Rand McNally & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  4. Goelz v. J. K. & Susie L. Wadley Research Institute & Blood BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  5. Sidney Stevens Implement Co. v. HintzeUtah Supreme Court · 1937

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API