Nash v. Weidenfeld
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the defendants, Camille Weidenfeld and another, from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the cleric of the county of New York on the 28tli day of February, 1899, upon the verdict of a jury rendered by direction of the court, and-also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 7th day of March, 1899, denying the defendants’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes. .
1Opinion of the Court
Rumsey, J.:
The action was Drought upon a promissory note made by the Worcester Cycle Manufacturing Company on the 1st of May, 1897, for the sum of $3,560.07*, due in forty days after date. The payee was the Shelby Steel Tube Company, and the note was made to pay that company a debt, which the maker owed to the payee. Before the note was delivered to the payee it was indorsed by the defendant Weidenfeld for the purpose of giving credit to it, and after it was so indorsed the maker delivered it to the payee. Before it was due the Shelby Steel Tube Company indorsed the note, and procured it to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Reed v. . RandallNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
- Norton v. . DreyfussNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- Rice v. . GrangeNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
3Cited by9 opinions
- Silberstein v. BlumAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Vitromar Piece Dye Works v. Lawrence of London, Ltd.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1969
- Meyer v. Everett Pulp & Paper Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1912
- Pease Oil Co. v. Monroe County Oil Co.New York Supreme Court · 1912
- Ginsberg v. LawrenceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1910
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.