Munsford v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Stolz, Judge.
These three defendants appeal from their convictions of the offense of robbery by force, for which they were jointly indicted and tried. Held:
1. Enumerated errors 1 through 5 pertain to the number and apportionment of peremptory challenges, or strikes, to which each individual defendant was entitled. Prior to 1972, our courts construed Code § 27-2101 to mean that, where persons jointly indicted for an offense go to trial together, "they do not waive any right of peremptory challenge, but each is entitled to his full statutory allowance.” (Emphasis supplied.) Cumming v. State, 99…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merino v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
- Cumming v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Butler v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
- Butts v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1972
- Timmons v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1967
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Welch v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1973
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Lyle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
- Hunter v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- A.C.G. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.