Robert Bugielski v. At&t Services, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT ROBERT J. BUGIELSKI; CHAD S. No. 21-56196 SIMECEK, individually as participants in the AT and T D.C. No. Retirement Savings Plan and as a 2:17-cv-08106- representatives of all persons similarly VAP-RAO situated, Plaintiffs-Appellants, OPINION v. AT&T SERVICES, INC.; AT&T BENEFIT PLAN INVESTMENT COMMITTEE, Defendants-Appellees. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Virginia A. Phillips, Chief District Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted October 17, 2022 Portland, Oregon Filed…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Skidmore v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Christensen v. Harris CountySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Mertens v. Hewitt AssociatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sean Kennedy v. Las Vegas Sands CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Board of Trustees of the Construction Industry and Laborers Health and Welfare Trust v. The Murray Family Co. L.L.C.District Court, D. Nevada · 2025
- Chea v. Lite Star ESOP CommitteeDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Nagy v. CEP America, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2024
- Oregon Potato Company, a Washington State Corporation; and the Oregon Potato Company Group Benefits Plan v. Darrell Strong, individually, and his marital community; Marsh & McLennan Agency LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company; and DWS Holdings LLC, a Washington Limited Liability Company, d/b/a Pinnacle PeakDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.