Legal Opinion

State v. Durgin

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided November 2, 1973PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POMEROY, Justice.

A York County jury properly constituted, has evaluated the evidence presented to it and has pronounced as legal fact that Scott Durgin, the appellant herein, did take the life of Carl L. Welch under such circumstances as to constitute unlawful homicide, punishable as murder.

That the trial was error free, at least up to the point of the Court’s instructions, is best evidenced by the fact that competent counsel for the appellant makes no claim of error.

In addition to a plea of not guilty, appellant Durgin entered a plea of not guilty by reason of mental disease and defect as…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Durham v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Ernest McDonald v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1962
  3. Thomas H. Washington, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1944
  5. State v. LawrenceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1870

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. FlickSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  2. State v. LewisohnSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1977
  3. State v. BuzynskiSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
  4. State v. WallaceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. State v. ArmstrongSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API