Legal Opinion

Jackson v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 10, 1937No. 26435PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacIntyre, J.

1. Where a motion for new trial contains only the general grounds, and the record discloses that the evidence for the State, if credible, was sufficient to support the verdict, the jury being the judges of the weight of the evidence, this court can not disturb the judgment of the trial court. Puckett v. State, 159 Ga. 230 (125 S. E. 208); Hudgins v. State, 2 Ga. 173 (5). “The law allows [the trial judge] to refuse or grant new trials in the exercise of a legal discretion, but *393it does not give this court ally discretion in the matter. It can only grant new trials where errors of law have been…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hudgins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1847
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1893
  3. Puckett v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1924

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moore v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  2. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Ry. v. HamCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  3. Fite v. McEntyreCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1948
  4. Prosser v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  5. Holton v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API