Legal Opinion

Dumas v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 14, 1960No. 606PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Company, hereinafter called the company, is a Virginia corporation with its legal domicile and principal office in the city of Richmond, Virginia. The summons in this action was issued on 14 January 1960 by the clerk of the Superior Court of Guilford County, and served 15 January 1960 on “Mr. William Hudson Trent, general agent Chesapeake and Ohio Railway Co.” by the sheriff of Forsyth County.

In support of its motion the company offered in evidence the affidavits of T. H. Keelor, its secretary, and of William Hudson Trent, who resides in the city of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. McGee v. International Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
  4. Travelers Health Assn. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  5. International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Burgess Ex Rel. Burgess v. GibbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Wainscott v. St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. J. B. Hunt & Sons, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Snelling & Snelling, Inc. v. WatsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
  5. Schnur & Cohan, Inc. v. McDonaldDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API