Chicago, St. Louis & Pittsburgh Railroad v. Fry
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Cass Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
The appellee, as the legal representative of *321Daniel L. Ery, deceased, brought this action against the appellant to recover for injuries received by him while in the service of appellant as brakeman on a freight train, which ■caused his death.
The.complaint charges that one of the cars of the defendant’s train upon which the decedent was employed was what is called a “ gondola ” car, upon which the brake-staff was located at the end of and close to the edge of the car; that this brake-staff was dangerous and unsafe to be used for the purpose for which it was intended and provided, by reason of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railway Co. v. AdamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Cincinnati, Hamilton & Dayton Railroad v. McMullenIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Stix v. SadlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Locke v. Merchants National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Gutridge v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1887
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Colorado &. S. Ry. Co. v. RoweTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- McNamara v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BatesIndiana Supreme Court · 1896
- Chicago, Indianapolis & Louisville Railway Co. v. BarkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.