Legal Opinion
Alamitos Land Co. v. Texas Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 4, 1936No. Civ. 10786PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOULD, J., pro tem.
By the terms of an oil lease dated February 26, 1927, defendant corporation as lessee agreed to pay plaintiff corporation as lessor one-fifth royalty for oil and gas produced on the latter’s property. The lease also specifically provided that if gas produced on the premises “shall be sold by lessee, said lessee shall pay said lessor one-fifth of the amount . . . received therefor” and also that “in the event that said lessee shall have produced or caused to be produced and saved gasoline or other products from the gas taken from said premises, the lessor shall be entitled…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hansen v. Fresno Jersey Farm Dairy Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
- Martin v. AmisTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Norton v. . WoodruffNew York Court of Appeals · 1849
- Potter v. Mt. Vernon Roller Mill Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1903
- Woodward v. SemansIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Saulsbury Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1944
- Shafford v. Otto Sales Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Rehbock v. Reservoir Hill Gasoline Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Avery v. Schuman Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1958
- Champlin Oil & Refining Company v. ChastainTexas Supreme Court · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.