Legal Opinion

Ham v. Veasey

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided August 31, 1920No. 11538PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Okfuskee County; John L. Norman, Judge. Action by P. H. Veasey against W. T. Ham and others, to cancel lease and for other relief. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

This action was instituted by defendant in error for the cancellation of certain agricultural leases and assignments, and to enjoin plaintiffs in error from setting up any claim to the lands involved. Plaintiffs in error interposed a demurrer to the petition, which, on December 22, 1919, was overruled by the court and judgment rendered against plaintiffs in error.

Appeal from this judgment and order of the court was filed in this court on June 24. 1920, more than six months having elapsed since the rendition of said judgment. The case is now before this court on motion of defendant in error to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. First State Bank of Warner v. PorterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  2. Dawson Schreiner v. Davis Bros. Cheese CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  3. Schollmeyer v. Van BuskirkSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Powell v. Johnson-Larimer Dry Goods Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  5. Dickerson v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nowahoma Oil & Gas Co. v. LongboneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  2. Russell v. GaltSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921
  3. Hamby v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Hamby v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Short v. RoeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API