Legal Opinion

First State Bank of Warner v. Porter

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1917No. 8505PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error from Superior Court, Muskogee Comity; H. C. Thurman, Judge. Action between the First State Bank of Warner and S. T. Porter. From the judgment, the former brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

This cause comes on to be heard upon a motion to dismiss the proceeding in error, upon the ground, among others, that the same was not commenced within the time provided by law. The record shows that the appeal was taken from a judgment rendered on the 12th day of February, 1916, and an order overruling the motion for new tidal therein, which was entered on the first day of April, 1916. No summons in error has been issued or served up to this time. It, therefore, appears that the proceeding in error was not commenced within the time required by chapter IS, Ress. Daws 1910-11, which provides:

“A…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Shelton v. WallaceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Larrick v. GilloonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Hall v. Bank of Commerce of OkmulgeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Ham v. VeaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  4. Hamby v. CarrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Hamby v. National Bank of CommerceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API