Legal Opinion
Schollmeyer v. Van Buskirk
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 11, 1913No. 4706PublishedCited by 4 opinions
Error from Oklahoma County Court; John W. Hayson, Judge. Action between J. H. Schollmeyer and Jacob Van Buskirk. From the judgment, Schollmeyer brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtWilliams', J.
This proceeding in error seeks to review, by means of a transcript, a judgment rendered in the trial court on May 24, 1912.
A proceeding in error, commenced in this court after the expiration of six months from the rendering of said judgment or the overruling of a motion for a new trial, must be dismissed.
The action of the lower court in overruling a motion for a new trial is not brought to this court by means of a transcript. Richardson et vir v. Beidleman et al., 33 Okla. 463, 126 Pac. 816, 818.
The proceeding in error must be dismissed.
All the Justices concur.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Richardson Et Vir v. BeidlemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ham v. VeaseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Blackmon v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
- University Realty Co. v. EnglishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- American Nat. Bank of Wetumika v. Hale-Halsell Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935