Legal Opinion
Krohn v. Steinlauf
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 21, 1959PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJames J. Crisona, J.
Plaintiffs move (1) for summary judgment against defendants The Travelers Insurance .Company and The Mutual Benefit Life Insurance Company and (2) to substitute the executors of the estate of one of the plaintiffs, Jacob Krohn. Each of said defendants cross-moves for summary judgment.
The substitution branch of plaintiffs’ motion is granted without opposition.
The salient facts underlying the controversy are as follows: On September 14, 1955 a trust agreement Avas entered into between three officers (therein and hereinafter referred to as the Trustees) of the Luggage and Leather Goods…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Degnan v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1942
- Prillaman v. Century Indemnity Co. of Hartford, ConnCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
- De Leon v. Aetna Life Insurance Co. of HartfordCity of New York Municipal Court · 1949
3Cited by2 opinions
- Blue Cross of Northeastern New York, Inc. v. AyotteNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- Society of New York Hospital v. MalskyCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976