Dooley v. Barberton Citizens Hospital
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
The issue before us is whether Barberton Citizens Hospital, through its by-laws, illegally discriminated against appellant, a licensed Doctor of Podiatric Medicine because of his practice as a podiatrist. For the reasons set forth below we find such discrimination had occurred. Accordingly we reverse the court of appeals and remand as hereinafter set forth.
This cause has witnessed a number of transformations in the hospital’s by-laws. Because of the importance of the issues to be resolved it is necessary to examine the factual basis of this case with close attention to the hospital by-laws…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Davidson v. Youngstown Hospital Ass'nOhio Court of Appeals · 1969
- Khan v. Suburban Community HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1976
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Rupe v. FourmanDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Holt v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1990
- Paul A. Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital District v. George J. LuibelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Fort Hamilton-Hughes Memorial Hospital Center v. SouthardOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- Siegel v. St. Vincent Charity Hospital & Health CenterOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
- Paul A. Stern v. Tarrant County Hospital District v. George J. LuibelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985