Legal Opinion

Khan v. Suburban Community Hospital

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 1976No. 75-239PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

Appellant hospital advances three propositions of law which are necessarily interrelated and interdependent and which may be refined into one fundamental issue posed to us for decision.

The question in controversy that emerges is: Where the board of trustees of a private, nonprofit hospital adopts reasonable, nondiseriminatory criteria for the privilege of practicing major general surgery in the hospital, and procedural due process is followed in adopting and applying such criteria, and a staff physician is unable to qualify thereunder, should a court substitute its evaluation of such matters…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Darling v. Charleston Community Memorial HospitalIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Doctor Robert Sosa v. Board of Managers of the Val Verde Memorial HospitalCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
  3. Shulman v. Washington Hospital CenterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1963
  4. Mitchell County Hospital Authority v. JoinerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  5. Khoury v. Community Memorial Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1962

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cameron v. New Hanover Memorial Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Nemazee v. Mt. Sinai Medical CenterOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ritter v. Board of CommissionersWashington Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Sadler v. Dimensions Healthcare Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Wolf v. McCullough-Hyde Memorial HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 1990

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API