Legal Opinion

Holt v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health Center

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided September 18, 1990No. 11930PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Brogan, Judge.

Dr. Richard Holt brought suit against Good Samaritan Hospital and Health Center (“the hospital” or “Good Samaritan”) and Samaritan Emergency Corporation (“S.E.C.”) for allegedly revoking his medical staff privileges without the benefit of a hearing. The trial court sustained a motion for summary judgment in favor of the hospital and S.E.C. This matter is now before the court on Holt’s timely notice of appeal from said judgment. Holt asserts three assignments of error, claiming that prior to the “limiting” of his privileges he was entitled to both procedural and substantive due…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Radiology Professional Corp. v. Trinidad Area Health Ass'nSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
  2. James G.P. Collins v. Associated Pathologists, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Adler v. Montefiore Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Lewin v. St. Joseph Hospital of OrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Khan v. Suburban Community HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Reddy v. Good Samaritan Hospital & Health CenterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
  2. Mahan v. Avera St. Luke'sSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Volcjak v. Washington County Hospital Ass'nCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999
  4. Garibaldi v. ApplebaumIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Dutta v. St. Francis Regional Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API