Legal Opinion

Mount v. State ex rel. Richey

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1883No. 9,661PublishedCited by 32 opinions

From the Scott Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— William J. Richey, the relator, was the trustee of Finley township, and as such deposited, as his predecessors for a long time had done, funds of the township in a private bank of another State; the bank failed, the money was lost, and Richey reimbursed the township. The taxpayers petitioned the Legislature to refund the money to him, and, in accordance with the prayer of the petition, an act was adopted directing that the township trustee should refund it; the trustee refused, and Richey applied for and received a writ of mandate.

It is true that public officers are bound at their peril to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. New Orleans v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Town of Guilford v. . the Supervisors of Chenango CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. Brewster v. . City of SyracuseNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
  4. County Commissioners v. People ex rel. MetzIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  5. Beauchamp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1842

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Chickasha Cotton Oil Co. v. Lamb & TynerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Robinson v. SchenckIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Johnson v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. City of Indianapolis v. NavinIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API