Legal Opinion
Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.
District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Decided February 27, 2003No. 6:02-cv-00571PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS OF FACT
FORESTER, Chief Judge.
I.THE PARTIES
1. The Plaintiff, Lexmark International, Inc. (“Lexmark”) is a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Lexington, Kentucky. Lexmark is a worldwide developer, manufacturer, and supplier of, inter alia, laser printers and toner cartridges. Lexmark Complaint (“Complaint”) ¶ 2.
2. The Lexmark products that are the focus of this dispute are Lexmark’s T520/522 and T620/622 laser printers and toner cartridges, and in particular, certain computer codes resident on microchips that are within the toner cartridges. See generally,…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Sony Corp. of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Campbell v. Acuff-Rose Music, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- The Chamberlain Group, Inc. v. Skylink Technologies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Arista Records, Inc. v. Flea World, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2005
- Storage Technology Corporation (Doing Business as Storagetek) v. Custom Hardware Engineering & Consulting, Inc., and David YorkCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- 321 Studios v. Metro Goldwyn Mayer Studios, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
- Davidson & Associates, Inc. v. Internet GatewayDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2004
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.