Legal Opinion
321 Studios v. Metro Goldwyn Mayer Studios, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 19, 2004No. C 02-1955-SIPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RESOLVING RELATED MOTIONS
ILLSTON, District Judge.
Presently before the Court are defendant/eounterclaimants’ motion for partial summary judgment, and various accompanying motions. Having carefully considered the arguments of counsel and the papers submitted, the Court hereby GRANTS defendant/counterclaimants motion for partial summary' judgment; GRANTS plaintiff Victor Mattison’s mo tion to dismiss defendants’ counterclaims; DENIES plaintiffs motion for denial or continuance of motion for summary judgment pursuant to Rule…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Lexmark International, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- MDY Industries, LLC v. Blizzard Entertainment, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- CoxCom, Inc. v. ChaffeeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Anschutz Corp. v. MERRILL LYNCH AND CO. INC.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. VidAngel, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.