Legal Opinion

T.S. v. Plain Dealer

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 16, 2011No. 96201PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James J. Sweeney, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant 1 appeals the trial court’s decisions that granted appellees’ motions to dismiss her claims against them. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.

{¶ 2} Plaintiffs complaint avers that a certain article, which was published by the Cleveland Plain Dealer in 1990, contained false information about her and was recently made available on the Internet via the Google search engine. Plaintiff contends that she has suffered emotional distress and embarrassment for the past 20 years and continues to do so as a consequence of the alleged…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Firth v. State of NYNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Churchill v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
  3. Hebrew Academy of San Francisco v. GoldmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Guccione v. Hustler Magazine, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1978
  5. Myles v. Johnson, 21600 (6-15-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Scottie Pippen v. NBCUniversal Media LLCCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Timothy L. Ashford, PC LLO v. RosesNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Reed v. JagnowOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. Hester v. Case W. Res. Univ.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Rowan v. SchafferOhio Court of Appeals · 2019

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API