Legal Opinion

Myles v. Johnson, 21600 (6-15-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 15, 2007No. 21600PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} Appellant, Albert Myles III, appeals the judgment of the trial court in favor of Defendant-Appellees, Floyd B. Johnson and others, granting summary judgment. Myles' claims were for defamation and breach of fiduciary duty stemming from the 2002 election for president of the Dayton Branch 3181 of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People ("NAACP").

{¶ 2} Myles sets forth seven assignments of error. He claims that the trial court erred in applying res judicata, collateral estoppel, the statute of limitations and the law of fiduciary duty. He also contends that…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dresher v. BurtOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Village of Grafton v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Brown v. Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Dupler v. Mansfield Journal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Brewer v. Cleveland City Schools Board of EducationOhio Court of Appeals · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Sys. Effect, L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. T.S. v. Plain DealerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  3. Fipps v. DayOhio Court of Appeals · 2022
  4. Kellie Auto Sales, Inc. v. HernandezOhio Court of Appeals · 2020
  5. Myles v. JohnsonOhio Supreme Court · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API