Legal Opinion

O'Connell v. Root

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 5, 1926PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSanderson, J.

In this action the plaintiff seeks to recover $4,500, alleged to be due him by virtue of an assign*220ment and acceptance. The defendants had the general contract for the erection of the Park Square Building in Boston, according to certain plans and specifications. In' June, 1922, they entered into a subcontract with one Edward D. Walsh to do the plastering and similar work upon the building according to the architects’ plans and specifications for $92,420, with a provision for additional payments for extras. This contract as modified provided that the defendants should „ pay Walsh on the…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Franklin v. North Weymouth Cooperative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  2. Sprague v. Rust Master Chemical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  3. Kurland v. Massachusetts Amusement Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  4. Williams v. Whitinsville Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  5. Dolben v. KaufmanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API