Legal Opinion

Kurland v. Massachusetts Amusement Corp.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided October 31, 1940PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRonan, J.

The first action is in contract. The plaintiffs seek in the first count of the declaration to recover $10,000, the rent for April and May, 1936, of a theatre in Springfield, in accordance with a lease given on August 15, 1929, to the defendant’s assignor. They seek in the second count to recover $9,000 — the difference between the amount of rental fixed by the lease and the amount paid by the defendant during 1933 and 1934, at the rate as reduced by two written agreements, one for each of said years — on the ground, as the plaintiffs allege, that the defendant did not pay the reduced rental…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Barnes v. Berkshire Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. Frati v. JanniniMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  3. Commonwealth v. CabotMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922
  4. Hanson & Parker, Ltd. v. WittenbergMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. C. W. Hunt Co. v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
  2. Commonwealth v. CapalboMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  3. Charles E. Burt, Inc. v. Seven Grand Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
  4. Cascella v. Jay James Camera Shop, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
  5. In re LoebMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API