Legal Opinion

Williams v. Whitinsville Savings Bank

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 26, 1933PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

This is an action of contract or tort in which the plaintiff seeks to recover $3,000, the balance unpaid and remaining to be advanced by the defendant on a mortgage note, or for damages in that amount for having alienated or released the real estate held as security therefor, for less than the face of the note. The defendant’s answer is a general denial. The case was called for trial and a-jury was empanelled. The trial judge on motion of the defendant directed a verdict in its favor at the close of the plaintiff’s opening statement to the jury. To this direction the plaintiff excepted. One…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Farnham v. Lenox Motor Car Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  2. Bennett v. Ætna InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
  3. O'Connell v. RootMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926
  4. Rothenberg v. Newton Mortgage Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930
  5. Joly v. StonemanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1930

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Douglas v. WhittakerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1949
  2. Alexander v. JenningsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Alexander v. JenningsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Sprague v. Rust Master Chemical Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1947
  5. Mulvaney v. City of WorcesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API