Legal Opinion
Harold Hobart v. Michael P. O'brien, Harold M. Hobart v. John G. Donovan
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided April 22, 1957No. 5172, 5173PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge.
These appeals are from final judgments based upon jury verdicts in personal injury actions, entered in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts on December 13, 1955, one (No. 5172) ordering that plaintiff-appellee, Michael P. O’Brien, recover of the defendant-appellant, Harold M. Hobart, in the sum of $61,000 with interest thereon from June 26, 1952 to-talling $12,677.83, and the other (No. 5173) denying the claim for recovery of plaintiff-appellant, Harold M. Hobart against defendants-appellees John G. Donovan and Michael P. O’Brien.…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Lavender v. KurnSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Moore-Mccormack Lines, Inc. v. AmiraultCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1953
- Commonwealth v. WestMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942
- New Amsterdam Casualty Co. v. SoileauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- John Furtado v. Harold Bishop, John Furtado v. Harold BishopCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Freeman v. Package Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
- Paula H. Roy v. Star Chopper Company, Inc., and Third-Party v. Ashok Hingorany and Advanced Materials Systems, Inc., Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1978
- Paul S. Segal v. Gilbert Color Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
- Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel Corporation, Computer Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Qantel CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1984
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.