Legal Opinion
Johnson v. La Bolt Oil Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 24, 1934No. File No. 7588PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Plaintift claimed compensation under the Workmen's Compensation Law (Rev. Code 1919, § 9436 et seq., as amended). 'Certain compensation was allowed by a two to one award by the Industrial Board, whic[i was affirmed by the commissioner on a petition for review. Thereafter an appeal was taken ■to the circuit court which sustained and affirmed the award made toy the commissioner. This appeal is from, the judgment rendered in the circuit court.
The respondent was an employee of the defendant La Bolt Oil Company, and the South Dakota Employers’ Protective Association furnished a workmen’s…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Matter of Jordan v. . Decorative Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matthiessen & Hegeler Zinc Co. v. Industrial BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 1918
- Hartz v. Hartford Faience Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
- Robbins v. Original Gas Engine Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1916
- Poccardi v. Public Service CommissionWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Almquist v. Shenandoah Nurseries, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1934
- Meyer v. RoetteleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
- King v. Johnson Bros. Construction CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1967
- Taylor v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. RogersCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.