Legal Opinion

Meekison v. Voinovich

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided August 21, 1998No. 96 CV 00931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

MARBLEY, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 27). Plaintiff Beth Ann Meekison filed this action against Defendants George Voino-vich, Reginald Wilkinson, and the Ohio Department of Rehabilitations and Corrections (“ODRC”) alleging violations of her rights under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. Jurisdiction is proper in this Court under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. For the reasons set forth…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bitney v. Honolulu Police DepartmentHawaii Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Schall v. Wichita State UniversitySupreme Court of Kansas · 2000
  3. Meekison v. VoinovichCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  4. Powell v. MorrisDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1998
  5. Karlik v. ColvinDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API