Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Engfer v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 9, 2015No. A13-872PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*298OPINION
DIETZEN, Justice.
Respondent Thomas V. Engfer ended his employment with General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc., in December 2011. Thereafter, Engfer applied for and received state unemployment benefits from appellant Department of Employment and Economic Development (DEED), and supplemental unemployment benefits through a plan offered by General Dynamics. DEED subsequently reviewed the SUB plan payments, determined that the payments counted as “wages” under MinmStat. § 268.035, subd. 29(a) (2014),1 and concluded that Engfer had been overpaid state unemployment benefits. An…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Shaw v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Connecticut National Bank v. GermainSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Ingersoll-Rand Co. v. McClendonSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- New York State Conference of Blue Cross & Blue Shield Plans v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Special School District No. 1 v. R.M.M. Ex Rel. O.M.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager v. American Family Mutual Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- John D. Perschbacher, Relator (A15-0619), (A15-2002) v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners, A15-619Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Superior Glass, Inc. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2017
- Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager v. American Family Mutual Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.