Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Smith

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided July 6, 1987No. 87-82Published

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, sold three separate insurance policies on three different automobiles to Mark and Christine Smith. Each of the policies provided identical coverage against one year’s loss of income as required by the no-fault statute, Ark. Stat. Ann. § 66-4014(b) (Repl. 1980). Appellant charged a premium on each policy for this coverage. The appellee, Christine Smith, was totally disabled in a car wreck. Each policy contained a limit on the benefits for loss of income. Appellant paid the limit of one policy but refused to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Hargett v. DodsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1979
  2. Beaver v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Creighton v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  4. Bryan v. AllenNevada Supreme Court · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API