Legal Opinion
Bryan v. Allen
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided July 9, 1980No. 10693PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Danny and Kenneth Bryan, two pedestrians, were injured by respondent Carl Allen’s negligent operation of an automobile. *573At the time of the accident, the Nevada Motor Vehicle Insurance Act (Chapter 698 of the Nevada Revised Statutes, repealed 1979 Nev. Stat., ch. 660, § 9) was still in effect. The Bryans received basic reparation benefits to cover their economic losses. See NRS 698.040; 698.070. Subsequently, the Bryans brought this tort action against Allen. See NRS 698.280(l)(i). No transcript of the trial appears in the record. The jury, instructed on the computation of damages for…
3Cases cited5 opinions
- Easom v. Farmers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1977
- Travelers Insurance v. LopezNevada Supreme Court · 1977
- J. C. Penney Co. v. GravelleNevada Supreme Court · 1944
- Cooke v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- Van Fleet v. O'NeilNevada Supreme Court · 1920
4Cited by2 opinions
- Mid-Century Insurance v. DanielNevada Supreme Court · 1985
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1987