Creighton v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
Suit was brought against defendant Fidelity & Casualty Company of New York. Said defendant moved for summary judgment and it was granted. Therefrom plaintiff, both in his individual and representative capacity, brought an appeal.
We affirm.
Involved is Personal Injury Protection coverage under Texas policies of insurance. In insurance circles this form of insurance is commonly called “PIP”.
We have concluded that the purpose prescribed relative to the insurance termed PIP is to indemnify the person enti- tied to benefits, i. e., to preserve such person from or secure…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Westchester Fire Insurance Company v. TuckerTexas Supreme Court · 1974
- American Motorists Insurance Company v. BriggsTexas Supreme Court · 1974
3Cited by6 opinions
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. KiddTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Travelers Indemnity Co. of Rhode Island v. LucasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Gerlich, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
- United Services Automobile Ass'n v. DicarloCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1984
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Gerlich, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.