Legal Opinion

Bailey v. Hayden

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 14, 1911No. 9559PublishedCited by 29 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Jefferson county, Still, J., entered March 13, 1911, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for trespass.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

— Action to recover' treble damages for cutting and removing timber from respondent’s land, adjoining the waters of Scow bay, in Jefferson county. The jury found specially: (l) That the appellants cut and removed from respondent’s land 45,000 feet of cedar timber; (£) that it was of a market value of $8 per thousand; (3) that it was taken without lawful authority; (4) that appellant, by the exercise of ordinary care, could have ascertained that the land from which the timber was taken belonged to respondent. A verdict was returned in favor of respondent for the sum of $360. The court entered…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Wooden-Ware Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Pine River Logging Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  3. White v. YawkeySupreme Court of Alabama · 1895
  4. Winchester v. CraigMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Gardner v. LovegrenWashington Supreme Court · 1902

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Jongeward v. BNSF Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Rayonier, Incorporated v. F. Arnold PolsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  3. Birchler v. Castello Land Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Grays Harbor County v. Bay City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Bill v. GattavaraWashington Supreme Court · 1949

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API