Legal Opinion

United States v. Einum

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 2, 1992No. 92-C-381-SPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

SHABAZ, District Judge.

Plaintiff United States of America commenced this mortgage foreclosure action against the defendants John L. Einum, Joann F. Einum and Hoof & Paw Clinic, Ltd. seeking to foreclose the defendants’ interest in certain real property which secured a loan made by plaintiff through the Farmers Home Administration. Defendants do not deny any of the allegations contained in the complaint, nor do they contest plaintiffs right to foreclose. Defendants, however, seek to enforce Wisconsin law which would permit them a one-year period of redemption, 846.10(2),…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Kimbell Foods, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. United States v. Stadium Apartments, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Victory Highway Village, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. James D. EllisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  5. United States v. ElverudDistrict Court, D. North Dakota · 1986

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. RezzonicoDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API