Eaton v. Laurel Delicatessen Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtSteveNs, J.
This is an appeal from an order denying plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to rule 113 of tbe Buies of Civil Practice.
This is an action upon 23 promissory notes executed by respondent corporation indorsed by tbe individual respondents and delivered to defendant Pumo, a contractor engaged to do certain work for tbe respondents.
Pumo sought to negotiate a sale of 24 of tbe series of 48 notes to tbe plaintiffs. Tbe plaintiffs, prior to tbe purchase thereof, obtained a written agreement from tbe corporate respondent on July 22, 1957 which warranted that the notes were a true…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Richard v. Credit SuisseNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
- Mount Vernon Trust Co. v. BergoffNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Hanrog Distributing Corp. v. HaniotiNew York Supreme Court · 1945
- Ahern v. . GoodspeedNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Schanz v. SotscheckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Quantum Corporate Funding Ltd. v. L.P.G. Associates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- A.I. Trade Finance, Inc. v. Altos Hornos de Vizcaya, S.A.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Ben Strauss Industries, Inc. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982