Legal Opinion

Schanz v. Sotscheck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 9, 1915PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Gross-appeals by the plaintiff, Joseph Schanz, and by the defendant, Carl Sotscheck, from parts of a judgment of the Supreme Court, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 10th day of July, 1914, upon the decision of the court after a trial at the New York Special Term.

1Opinion of the Court

Laughlin, J.:

This is an action for the foreclosure of a mortgage executed by the defendants Carl Sotscheck and Julia A. Sotscheck, his wife, on premises owned by him, to one Sarah E. Sinnigar and delivered to her on the 15th day of February, 1911, as collateral security for the payment of §12,000 evidenced by their bond executed concurrently therewith. The bond and mortgage were in fact executed for the purpose of having them assigned to the plaintiff; but that was unknown to him. Concurrently with their execution and delivery to the mortgagee, or within an hour or two thereafter, she…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Simar v. . CanadayNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
  2. Krumm v. . BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  3. Payne v. . BurnhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Eastman v. . ShawNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  5. Union Dime Savings Institution v. WilmotNew York Court of Appeals · 1883

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. OttersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Bernstein v. FuerthNew York City Court · 1928
  3. Cohen v. EisenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  4. First National Bank v. American Near East & Black Sea Line, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Gleason v. O'NeillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API