Linograph Co. v. Bost
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtM'eharty, J.
This is the second appeal in this case. The suit was originally brought in the Johnson Chancery Court to recover $2,149.50, the balance of the purchase money due on a typesetting machine, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage given to secure the debt.
S. H. Logan bought the property from the appellant, and executed the notes and mortgage upon which suit was brought. Logan afterwards sold his business to Hunter and Bost, and Hunter and Bost purchased the typesetting machine from appellant, and assumed the payment of the unpaid notes given by Liogan.
One of the defenses in that case was that…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stevens v. ShullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
- Lower v. HickmanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- Henry v. IrbySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Linograph Company v. LoganSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Chicago Mill & Lumber Co. v. Osceola Land Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Byme, Inc. v. IvySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- Byme, Inc. v. IvySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2006
- M. L. Sigmon Forest Products, Inc. v. ScrogginsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1969