Henry v. Irby

This is the second appeal in this case. The case on former appeal is reported in 170 Ark. 928, 282 S. W. 3. On the former appeal the court stated that:

“It appears that Henry had cultivated the same land for the years 1919, 1920 and 1921, and that Mrs, Burel had carried over a balance accumulated during this pxbor tenaxxcy'into her 1922 aecouxxt. The testimony also shows that Henry agreed to give Mrs. Burel a chattel mortgage on his stock and his interest ixx the crop to secure this balance, but did xiot do so.”

The court also held that all the money in Bloom’s haxxds was derived from the sale…