St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. Jackson
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Concurrence
John A. Fogleman, Justice.
I concur in all of the court’s application of the “law of the case” except as to that portion relating to the mental anguish award to grandparents. I do not think that the doctrine has any application to this part of the judgment of the court below. While the rule is a necessary and salutary one, its recognized harshness should not be extended beyond those situations in which it is necessary, particularly to reach a patently erroneous result, as is the case here. I have been unable to find any ease where this court has made the doctrine applicable to a situation of…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Hartford Fire Insurance v. EnochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Company v. JacksonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Miller Lumber Company v. FloydSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Missouri Pac. R.R. Co., Thompson v. Gilbert, Adm.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
- Mode v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.