Legal Opinion
Bank of Ephraim v. Davis
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 6, 1977No. 14514PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
We consider an appeal and a cross-appeal. Each claims error in the assignment of priorities to the mortgage liens of the two appellants. Also at issue is the award of attorney’s fees to cross-appellant Prudential Federal Savings and Loan Association, hereafter Prudential.
We discover no error in the assignment of priorities, nor in the award of attorney’s fees; and therefore, affirm. No costs awarded.
The Bank of Ephraim, which was first in time to record its mortgage, contends a dragnet clause in its mortgage is sufficient to give it priority, for all sums owed by its…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Holland v. BrownUtah Supreme Court · 1964
- Potwin State Bank v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
- Wallace v. Build, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1965
- Seal v. Tayco, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1965
- Heller v. Gate City Building and Loan AssociationNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Copper State Leasing Co. v. Blacker Appliance & Furniture Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1988
- Everett Credit Union v. Allied Ambulance Services, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
- Cache National Bank v. LusherSupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Bank of the Wichitas v. LedfordSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
- In Re WilliamsonUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.