Legal Opinion

Seal v. Tayco, Inc.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 1965No. 10171PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Plaintiff as collection agent assignee of the American Brakeshoe Company (for brevity and clarity called Amsco, and the interests of both are referred to herein as the plaintiff) sued on an account for wares and merchandise delivered to the defendant Tayco, Inc. At pre-trial it was determined that defendant was indebted in the sum of $3,584.42; and there was reserved for trial the disputed issue as to what, if any, damages plaintiff was liable for on what was, in effect, a counterclaim for breach of contract in failing to deliver a certain order of tractor shoes as agreed.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toomer's Estate v. Union Pac. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Sprague v. Boyles Bros. Drilling Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Boise Ass'n of Credit Men, Ltd. v. United States Fire InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Elliott Leases Cars, Inc. v. QuigleySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1977
  2. Hillcrest Country Club v. N.D. Judds Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Bank of Ephraim v. DavisUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Christopher v. Larson Ford Sales, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Marriot v. PACIFIC NATIONAL LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANYUtah Supreme Court · 1970

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API