Legal Opinion
James v. City of Wichita
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided December 7, 1968No. 45,161PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Fromme, J.:
This is an appeal from a judgment dismissing an action against a city for the reason the petition failed to contain a sufficient statement and denying permission to amend the petition for the reason the statute of limitations had intervened.
The petition filed by Moetta James alleges:
“On August 28, 1964, at the intersection of Payne and 17th Streets, in Wichita, Sedgwick County, Kansas, Loyns Manuel, an agent of the City of Wichita, while acting upon the business of the City of Wichita, negligently drove a motor vehicle against the vehicle in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- United States Ex Rel. Texas Portland Cement Co. v. McCordSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States of America, for the Use and Benefit Of, Statham Instruments, Inc. v. Western Casualty & Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
- Cook v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
- Hibbs v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Brooks v. DietzSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Augusta Bank & Trust v. BroomfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1982
- Williams v. Amoco Production Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987
- Woods v. Homes & Structures of Pittsburg, Kansas, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1980
- Bradford v. MahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.