Strain v. Kern
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Simpson,
As administrator of the estate of Joseph Strain, deceased, plaintiff sued defendant to recover damages for. the latter’s alleged negligence, which resulted in injuries' to and the death of plaintiff’s decedent. The affidavit of defense averred, as a matter of law, that plaintiff could not legally commence such an action; the court below sustained this contention and éntered judgment accordingly ; hence plaintiff appeals.
*211Conceding that the suit could not have been maintained prior to the passage of the Fiduciaries Act of June 7, 1917, P. L. 447, appellant “plants…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Provident Life & Trust Co. v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
- Dorsey & Macklin, & Donnelly & Co.'s AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1872
- Diver v. DiverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1867
- Smith v. Altoona & Philipsburg Connecting RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
- Central District & Printing Telegraph Co. v. Homer City BoroughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
3Cited by35 opinions
- City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Pezzulli v. D'AmbrosiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Phillips's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
- Regan v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
- Reeves v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.