Legal Opinion

Phillips's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1928No. Appeal, 5PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Simpson,

On the hearing of a petition for an issue devisavit vel non, contestants produced three of decedent’s attending physicians. They said she was suffering from paresis, and was not competent to make a will. On cross-examination they testified that, in their opinion, paresis can result only from syphilis; but did not say whether or not, in her case, it was inherited, or arose because of her personal actions, and if so, whether they were proper or improper. Assuming that the disclosure of the fact stated would tend to blacken her character, the trial judge ultimately…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Class & Nachod Brewing Co. v. GiacobelloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Haughton v. Aetna Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Provident Life & Trust Co. v. HammondSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  4. Spangler's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Strain v. KernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. City of Philadelphia v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  2. In Re B.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  3. Belmont Laboratories, Inc. v. HeistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. In Re the June 1979 Allegheny County Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Commonwealth v. StofchekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API