Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Philadelphia Suburban Water Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 29, 1926No. Appeal, 259PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Justice Schaffeb,

The question we are here to determine is whether defendant water company possesses and may exercise the power of eminent domain to condemn plaintiffs’ lands for the purpose of erecting a reservoir. On plaintiffs’ bill for an injunction to forbid the taking, the learned court below refused the relief prayed for; and from this denial of the remedy to which they allege themselves to be entitled, plaintiffs lay before us this appeal.

The Philadelphia Suburban Water Company was formed by the merger and union of thirty-four water companies, all of them chartered prior…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Attorney General v. BennSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  2. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  3. Strain v. KernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Commonwealth v. SweeneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  5. Pennsylvania Utilities Co. v. Public Service CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. Great American Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
  2. Commonwealth v. StofchekSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Commonwealth v. Girard Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Commonwealth v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  5. New Castle City v. WithersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API