Malooly v. York Heating & Ventilating Corp.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBushnell, J.
For some years plaintiffs, located in Detroit, have been engaged in the business of slaughtering animals and selling dressed meats, particularly lamb and veal, to retail merchants. Desirous of serving their increased trade, an adjoining building was rented for the purpose of enlarging the plant. Defendant York Heating & Ventilating Corporation is a Pennsylvania corporation. Their advertisement of a system of cold storage and meat cooling devices came to the attention of plaintiffs. Shortly thereafter one of the copartners, Boudia, talked with Cohen of the Burge Ice Machine Company of Detroit…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Tauza v. . Susquehanna Coal Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- International Harvester Co. of America v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- United States v. CarverSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Simon v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1915
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Brown v. DavenportSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Williams v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Walters v. Arenac Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Calo, Inc. v. AMF Pinspotters, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1961
- Great Lakes Realty Corp. v. PetersMichigan Supreme Court · 1953
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.