Legal Opinion
Stuart v. Civil Service Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided November 8, 1985No. A020552PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WHITE, P. J.
Ray Stuart and Sonja Dale appeal from an order denying their petition for mandate and the judgment entered thereon in favor of respondents. The parties agree that the sole issue is whether section 9.16 of the rules of the San Francisco Civil Service Commission (Civil Service Commission) is in conflict with section 8.323 of the Charter of the City and County of San Francisco (City Charter). We conclude, contrary to the trial court, that the two provisions are in conflict; we therefore reverse.
The facts are not in dispute. Appellants participated in oral civil service…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harman v. City and County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Campen v. GreinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Currieri v. City of RosevilleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
3Cited by5 opinions
- San Diego City Firefighters v. Board of Administration of San Diego City Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Sacramento County Alliance of Law Enforcement v. County of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- St. Croix v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Newsham v. Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Service Employees International Union, Local 390/400 v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986