Legal Opinion
Hurd v. Hull
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 15, 1793PublishedCited by 3 opinions
Petition for a new trial on account of having misplead. The petition was continued from last court by the agreement of the parties, and was now to have been beard oni the merits; and it being now discovered that the duty has never been paid on the petition, this question was put to the court — 'Whether the duty might now be paid and certified and tbe canse proceed.
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
The statute is express and positive that no writ shall be valid, etc. unless the duty is paid and certified; and the agreement of the parties cannot alter the law.
2Cited by3 opinions
- Morse v. RankinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
- "Harris Millinery Supply" v. Harris GansConnecticut Superior Court · 1936
- Harris v. Harris & Gans Co.Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas · 1936