Legal Opinion

Harris v. Harris & Gans Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 2, 1936No. File #36723Published

1Opinion of the CourtGarlick, J.

The defendant, Harris & Gans Co., Inc., is a Connecticut corporation and having its office and principal place of business in Norwalk. The plaintiff is of the City and State of New York, in other words a non-inhabitant of this State.

The writ recites “Jennie A. Slavitt of Norwalk, Conn., is recognized in $75.00 to prosecute etc.”. Also “I, A. D. Slavitt, the subscribing authority, hereby certify that I have personal knowledge as to the financial responsibility of the plaintiff *435and deem it sufficient to pay costs in this action.”

The said defendant pleads in abatement because the plaintiff, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lovejoy v. IsbellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
  2. Morse v. RankinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1883
  3. Bradley v. VailSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
  4. Miller v. CrossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  5. Vincent v. Mutual Reserve Fund Life Asso.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1903

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API